ISSN 2658–5782
DOI 10.21662
Electronic Scientific Journal





© Институт механики
им. Р.Р. Мавлютова
УФИЦ РАН

Яндекс.Метрика web site traffic statistics

A.E. Fetisov, R.S. Khatmullina Research of numerical indicators for the development of the Asselskaya area of Orenburg oil and gas condensate field using the material balance method. Multiphase Systems. 19 (2024) 1. 1–6.
2024. Vol. 19. Issue 1, Pp. 1–6
URL: http://mfs.uimech.org/mfs2024.1.001,en
DOI: 10.21662/mfs2024.1.001
Research of numerical indicators for the development of the Asselskaya area of Orenburg oil and gas condensate field using the material balance method
A.E. Fetisov, R.S. Khatmullina
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University, Ufa, Russia

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to analyze and forecast the development indicators of the Assel deposit of Orenburg oil and gas condensate field. To complete this task, a large amount of data is required, which was obtained from the technological development project. The calculation is performed using a program written in the Python programming language. The variables for the material balance equation are given, some of them are calculated using intermediate formulas. The average values of the parameters over the last 15 years of development were chosen as the optimized parameters, since small amounts of cumulative production in the first years of development can lead to a significant error in the calculation of the material balance equation. Also, a comparison was made of the estimated forecast for the development of the Assel deposit with the forecast, according to the state plan, presented in the field development project. The comparison was made on the main parameters: cumulative oil production, annual oil production, oil recovery factor and water cut. For a visual comparison of the calculated parameters, dependency graphs are presented that reflect the forecast made by the material balance method, as well as the forecast based on the data of the state plan. The difference in the behavior of the curves shown on the graphs can be explained by the inaccuracy of the parameters describing the reservoir, as well as the inaccuracy of determining the initial recoverable reserves. This is also affected by the difference in reservoir drawdowns for injection and production wells, proposed in the state plan and in the forecast. Of course, the inaccuracy of the injectivity and productivity coefficients of wells, which were selected based on the estimated volumes of water injection and oil production, also affects. Based on the calculation performed, it can be concluded that it is expedient to further exploit the Asselskaya area of Orenburg oil and gas condensate field with the introduction of a reservoir pressure maintenance system until 2079. According to the forecasts, the water cut equal to 96% will be achieved in 2079, while the oil recovery factor will be 0.427.

Keywords

production analysis,
material balance,
production and injection forecast,
reservation pressure dynamics,
displacement characteristics

References

  1. [Technological project for the development of ONGCM] Tekhnologicheskiy proyekt razrabotki ONGKM. Orenburg: LLC VolgoUralNIPIgaz, LLC Gazprom dobycha Orenburg. 2012. (in Russian)
  2. Bulygin D.V., Engels A.A. [Analysis of the structure of residual oil reserves for carrying out geological and technical measures]. Interval [Interval]. 2007. No. 11(106). Pp. 6–11. (in Russian)
  3. Gray Forest. Petroleum Production in Nontechnical Language. PennWell Books. 1995. 288 p.
  4. Abidov D.G., Kamartdinov M.R. [The material balance method as a primary tool for assessing the indicators of the development of a field site during waterflooding] // Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering [Izvestiya tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring georesursov]. 2013. Vol. 322, No. 1. Pp. 91–96. (in Russian)
    EDN: pvlhvt
  5. Fanci J.R., Christiansen R.L. Introduction to oil production technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 2009. 290 p.
  6. Aziz K., Settari A. Petroleum Reservoir Simulation. Springer Netherlands. 1979. 476 p.
  7. Geron A. Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow. Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems. O’Reilly Media, Inc. 2019. 510 p.
  8. Lutz M. Learning Python, 4th edition. O’Reilly Media, Inc. 2009. 1214 p.
  9. Fetisov A.E. [Development analysis, material balance, production and injection forecast, reservoir pressure dynamics, PVT correlations, displacement characteristics] Analiz razrabotki, material’nyj balans, prognoz dobychi i zakachki, dinamika plastovogo davleniya, PVT korrelyatsii, kharakteristika vytesneniya. Bachelor’s Thes. Ufa. 2022. 73 p. (in Russian).
  10. Mishchenko I.T. [Calculations in the production of oil and gas] Raschety pri dobyche nefti i gaza. Moscow: Izd-vo «NEFT’ i GAZ» RGU nefti i gaza im. I.M. Gubkina. 2008. 296 p. (in Russian).
  11. Dake L.P. Fundamentals reservoir engineering. Amsterdam-London-New York-Tokyo: ELSEVIER, 1978. 498 p.